Tittle: Climate Change May Magnify Toxic Chemical Dangers
Author: Lynne Peeples
The draft highlights concerns ranging from melting sea ice to diminishing crop yields to health dangers from hunger and heat waves. The now studies highlight how global warming may affect the movement, as well as how a changing climate might weaken the ability of animals and humans to tolerate those chemicals. Greater chemical exposures could hamper a polar bear's or human baby's ability to handle extreme temperatures, severs storms, lack of food or other hazards of climate change. The issue of health effects of persistent organic organic pollutants, or Pops coupled with climate change is a complex, tricky issue. The convention adopted new guidance to account for climate change in its work, based on the group's 2011 review of global warming's effects on the dynamics and toxicity of Pops.
Heavy rainfalls, also predicted with climate change, could wash organochlorines previously bound to soil into lakes and rivers, where they could then enter the food chain and ultimately our bodies. Meanwhile, more organochlorine pesticides are still entering the environment.Exposure to organochlorine pesticides - apart from any additional possible risks from climate change - has already been linked to a number of human health problems, including birth defects, cancer and diabetes. hildren exposed in the womb to two organochlorine pesticides, hexachlorobenzene and PCB s, were more likely to develop asthma.Legacy organochlorines pesticides mixer and beta-hexachlorocyclohexane were more commonly found in the blood of study participants with endometriosis than those without the condition.
Climate change is going to mobilize these Pops, so they are more likely to be encountered in our lives, since many of these chemicals are stored in animal fat, regardless of whether or not you're talking about climate change, one of the best things to do is to eat lower on the food chain. To me the wealthy will have gotten theirs - that's all that matters to conservatives. They scream about the country's debt, but they don't mind leaving a broken government and a broken planet to their grandchildren at all - greed is good, the conservative way in America, and everybody else can go fish.
Author: Lynne Peeples
The draft highlights concerns ranging from melting sea ice to diminishing crop yields to health dangers from hunger and heat waves. The now studies highlight how global warming may affect the movement, as well as how a changing climate might weaken the ability of animals and humans to tolerate those chemicals. Greater chemical exposures could hamper a polar bear's or human baby's ability to handle extreme temperatures, severs storms, lack of food or other hazards of climate change. The issue of health effects of persistent organic organic pollutants, or Pops coupled with climate change is a complex, tricky issue. The convention adopted new guidance to account for climate change in its work, based on the group's 2011 review of global warming's effects on the dynamics and toxicity of Pops.
Heavy rainfalls, also predicted with climate change, could wash organochlorines previously bound to soil into lakes and rivers, where they could then enter the food chain and ultimately our bodies. Meanwhile, more organochlorine pesticides are still entering the environment.Exposure to organochlorine pesticides - apart from any additional possible risks from climate change - has already been linked to a number of human health problems, including birth defects, cancer and diabetes. hildren exposed in the womb to two organochlorine pesticides, hexachlorobenzene and PCB s, were more likely to develop asthma.Legacy organochlorines pesticides mixer and beta-hexachlorocyclohexane were more commonly found in the blood of study participants with endometriosis than those without the condition.
Climate change is going to mobilize these Pops, so they are more likely to be encountered in our lives, since many of these chemicals are stored in animal fat, regardless of whether or not you're talking about climate change, one of the best things to do is to eat lower on the food chain. To me the wealthy will have gotten theirs - that's all that matters to conservatives. They scream about the country's debt, but they don't mind leaving a broken government and a broken planet to their grandchildren at all - greed is good, the conservative way in America, and everybody else can go fish.